Proposal #7

Should this paper be considered for the Best Paper prize? (yes/no)
No

On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the overall organization/clarity of the paper? (1-10)
6.5

On a scale of 1 to 10, how would you rate the overall paper? (1-10)
7.5



* Overall, is the paper clear, concise, and well-organized?
The proposals organ is clear and concise, however, it lacks depth.  Organization is poor; paragraphs 
do not flow together.  There is no development of any "big ideas."

* Does the paper meet the posted guidelines?
No. It does not meet the length requirement.

* How does the project idea fit within the framework of Developmental Robotics?
Yes.  They attempt to have the robot learn to control a joystick.

* Describe what you like BEST about the report.
Its novelty.  The first 3 pages.

* Describe what you like LEAST about the report.
This report doesn't say anything.  It's pages upon pages of garbled thought.

* Do you have any suggestions for improvement?
The introduction needs to be reworked.  The wording does not convey your intentions well,
and you end the introduction with an incomplete sentence.  There isn't even a period.

Stray characters and grammar errors abound throughout the paper.  Examples:
actualy (section 2.1, 1st para. should be 'actual')
therefore assume[d] (section 4.3.1)

* Any other comments or suggestions?
The paper is not polished.  It feels like it was written the night before the due date.
In addition, the sentences do not convey meaning in a logical or concise manner.

Favorite quotations: 
"This aspect of the learning process is both significant and non-trivial..."
"When placed in fronto of a mirror"